A homicide committed while attempting to effect an arrest or to prevent an escape can only be justified in:

The justification for a homicide committed while attempting to effect an arrest or prevent an escape is heavily tied to the severity of the crime involved. The correct response indicates that such a drastic measure can only be justified in atrocious felony cases as an absolute last resort. This reflects the legal principle that in situations where a suspect poses a significant threat to life or safety, force may be justified, but only when it is absolutely necessary.

In practice, this means that law enforcement officers or individuals acting under the authority of the law are permitted to use lethal force only when faced with an imminent threat that warrants such measures, typically seen in rare and extreme cases. The key aspect here is the notion of "absolute last resort," highlighting that all other options for apprehending the suspect or preventing harm must have been exhausted or be deemed infeasible.

The other options present scenarios that do not meet the stringent criteria necessary for justifying homicide. Effecting an arrest for misdemeanors, even when involving a fleeing suspect, generally does not meet the threshold for justifying lethal force. Similarly, while the arrest of any felon may invoke significant legal concerns, the justification for lethal force is reserved for those situations involving grave threats to public safety, particularly in the context of atrocious fel