In order to make the proof of intent easier in proving shoplifting, many stores have a policy that:

The focus is on the practicalities involved in proving intent in shoplifting cases. Many stores adopt a policy that mandates capturing the alleged thief only after they have exited the premises. This approach often helps to establish a stronger case regarding the intent to commit theft.

When a suspect is apprehended after leaving the store, it can be argued that they did not have genuine intent to purchase the merchandise, which reinforces the notion that they intended to steal rather than mistakenly walking out with unpaid items. Furthermore, once the individual has left the store, they may have crossed an important legal threshold that can make evidence of theft more compelling in court, especially regarding the presumption of intent.

This practice also helps mitigate potential legal challenges related to false imprisonment or violations of an individual's rights that can arise from detaining someone within the store. By apprehending after they have left, stores may position themselves to argue more effectively in legal situations.

Other approaches, such as apprehending immediately when theft occurs or as soon as the item is concealed, may not consistently establish the necessary proof of intent since there could be plausible deniability about the thief's intentions before leaving the premises. Apprehending only upon the issuance of a warrant would not be effective in most shoplifting situations, as