Many offenses that do not require proof of intent are known as?

The correct answer is strict liability crimes. These are offenses that do not require the prosecution to prove that the offender had any intent to commit the crime. This means that an individual can be found guilty simply for engaging in the prohibited conduct, regardless of their mental state or intent at the time.

Strict liability crimes are often associated with regulatory offenses, such as those pertaining to public safety, health, or environmental protections, where the law aims to promote a high standard of care. The rationale behind this is to ensure compliance and protect the public without the need for lengthy inquiries into the defendant's state of mind.

In contrast, common-law crimes refer to offenses defined by legal precedents rather than statutes, requiring proof of intent. True crimes generally refer to offenses that are considered morally wrong and typically involve a level of intent. Mala in se crimes are acts that are inherently evil or wrong by nature, often also requiring intent to establish guilt.