The U.S. Department of Justice's stance on polygraph results as evidence is what?

The U.S. Department of Justice maintains a position that polygraph results are generally not considered reliable enough to be admissible as evidence in court. This stance is rooted in concerns about the accuracy and validity of polygraph testing, which can produce false positives and negatives due to various factors, including psychological stress and individual physiological responses.

Consequently, courts often view polygraph results with skepticism, and many jurisdictions have established strict guidelines regarding their use. The rejection of polygraph results as reliable evidence helps ensure that legal judgments are based on more robust and scientifically valid forms of evidence, protecting the integrity of the judicial process.

In the context of this question, while supporters of polygraph testing may argue for its potential utility in specific circumstances, the predominant viewpoint of the Justice Department emphasizes a cautious approach, favoring the exclusion of polygraph results from legal proceedings to avoid the pitfalls associated with their irregularities.