What legal theory allows for liability without fault in certain situations?

Strict liability theory is a legal concept that allows for liability without the need to prove fault or negligence. Under this theory, an individual or entity can be held responsible for damages or injuries resulting from their actions or products, regardless of the care they took to prevent harm. This is particularly relevant in cases involving inherently dangerous activities or defective products, where the risk of harm is so significant that the law holds the party responsible even if they acted with reasonable care.

For instance, if a company manufactures a product that is found to be defective and causes injury to a consumer, that company can be held liable under strict liability, regardless of whether they took proper precautions during the manufacturing process. The focus is on the action or the product itself rather than the intent or negligence of the party responsible.

This legal theory is crucial in promoting safety and ensuring that individuals or organizations that engage in high-risk activities or produce potentially harmful products are accountable for the consequences of their actions.