Which of the following is generally not true regarding the constitutional limitation on arrest powers of private police?

The statement that a private police agent operates under the same constitutional limitations as public police is generally not true. Public police officers are sworn to uphold the law and have the authority granted by the state, which includes certain constitutional protections and limitations designed to protect citizens’ rights. In contrast, private police, while they do have some powers to detain and enforce property rights, do not hold the same level of authority as public officers and therefore are not subject to the same constitutional requirements.

For example, private police are primarily authorized to act within the confines of the property they are hired to protect and their authority can be significantly limited when it comes to arresting individuals. They typically do not have the power to arrest without a warrant or probable cause in the same way public police do.

Understanding this distinction helps clarify the unique role of private police compared to their public counterparts, emphasizing that the legal restrictions and responsibilities of private police agents are different and less extensive. This is essential for comprehending the rights and limitations of private security entities in their operational context.