Which principle of protective lighting is not correct?

The principle regarding lighting on security patrol routes emphasizes that proper illumination is essential for effective surveillance and protection. While it's true that patrol routes should be adequately lit to prevent ambushes and improve visibility for security personnel, the idea of "a lot of light" is not optimal. Intense lighting can create harsh shadows and bright spots that may hinder rather than help visibility. Instead of illuminating areas excessively, the aim should be to provide adequate light levels that enhance the ability to detect unusual activities without causing glare or disrupting night vision.

Proper lighting design should create a balance that both illuminates and camouflages potential threats, ensuring that security measures function effectively. This involves a holistic approach to lighting that collaborates with other security measures and ensures an even distribution of light in surrounding areas, rather than overwhelming brightness in specific locations. Ultimately, effective protective lighting should enhance overall security without compromising visibility or creating hazardous conditions for those patrolling the area.